Ken Smith Photo Journal



Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

hiatus

without comments


Leaf Heart

Hiatus sounds like a relaxing pause, but it has been the opposite around here. Since the first of June there have been shows, deliveries, new work, auto maintenance…..you name it. Little time to catch one’s breath. I am not complaining, for in this economy to be prospering is a joy. I only wish there was a better vitamin, or maybe that ‘hiatus’ that means ‘peace’ for just a brief time.


I am working on new work for a couple shows coming up. At the same time, brewing in my mind, is a dissertation about ‘Passion’ and being an artist. I hope to have that written soon. So please stand by and I will fill in the spaces shortly with pictures and philosophies.


Written by Ken Smith

July 2nd, 2010 at 10:05 am

traveling inward

without comments


Windowseat

Maybe the weather, maybe a series of events that have become a struggle…sometimes one has to take a long trip inward. This image of a castle window seat, in the Castilla Belmonte, in the LaMancha region of central Spain reminds me of that inward trek. As I wander alone, looking at this image, I imagine the numbers of women and men back in time that have sat at this window seat, pondering their own imbroglios. It is somehow comforting to know that there were places in the architecture of an old castle made specifically for contemplation.



Written by Ken Smith

May 5th, 2010 at 4:01 pm

Posted in Philosophy, Travel

the photo marketplace

with 2 comments

 

Late Chrysanthemum

Yesterday there was this article on the front page of the online NY Times about how professional photographers have been required to make fundamental changes due to the influence of the digital world, the internet….and the sheer numbers of photographs being made and marketed by amateurs and parttimers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30photogs.html?src=me&ref=general

The article reflects almost exactly what I have been recognizing in the marketplace for my own professional work in the past few years. I used to secondarily sell my fine art imagery via a stock photo agency; and a check occasionally helped tremendously to allow me to keep making fine art work. Then, that stock agency was bought out by Getty, who was not interested in fine art work, and then the microstock and royalty free business plan came about……and, well, you know the rest. The stock industry then became more of an amateur’s market. I moved on, and gave stock little more thought. That part of the marketplace had turned away from the path I wished to follow. What distinguishes a professional from an amateur, is that the professional is in it for the long haul, attempting to create credibility, a reliable reputation. A style, a niche. One who can be contacted by another professional needing that quality. It can only happen over time, and time culls out the amateur.

An amateur just doesn’t have the available time, as does a professional who is in it 24/7. The amateur has a job to go to each day. Maybe the royalty free or microstock agency can work with the parttimer, but serious professionals want to work with other professionals who are just as serious, and who have something to lose, besides grocery money. I think it is necessary to have to risk something, to sacrifice something, in the quest of a career. I cannot quantify it, but it seems in the spirit and nature of commitment to the work.
 
So it makes sense that my stock royalties are gone. It causes me to focus more directly on my fine art work. The real reasons I got into my work are there more pronounced than ever. More significant work is wishing to be made. New materials worked with, profound feelings to express. And the marketplace and money aside, I thrust myself more eagerly into the work as though it is more important than it has ever been.

 
What concerns me the most about the jillions of images being made, is that the reputation of the ‘image’ may become diluted. If photography is seemed too easy, so nonchalant, will it become the equivalent of ‘small talk’? Has it already lost its presence? Are we so flooded by images made, shared, given away free to the marketplace…that they are no longer trusted as symbols of contemplation or accurate expression, of anything?

It can make the work of the fine art photographer even more challenging. The work must be so filled with significance, so well crafted, that it can alone in the strength of its visual presence, convince the viewer that this work rises above the millions of images, is meaningful beyond what he/she experiences every day. This image, is imbued with a heart, and the viewer is reminded of something she already has known deeply, and feels an innate belonging to what the image shows. Maybe it is the same primal task as it has always has been, but as the Times article implies, it may be more tough for the serious photographer – and the viewer – as we go forward.


Written by Ken Smith

March 30th, 2010 at 7:57 pm

Posted in Philosophy, Still Life

the female gesture

without comments

Nude with Leaf

Nude with Leaf

‘the female gesture’ is the title of my nude show opening February 6 at The Studio, in Twisp, WA. As is usual when putting together a one-person show, the artist needs to write an artist statement, which is something said on one page about the show’s content, what is behind the work, and maybe a bit about the artist. It is always difficult to write in words what is essentially the task of the work on the walls to portray visually. In the Reading section on the right sidebar, is a copy of the artist statement I wrote to go with the show.

In a short paragraph I can summarize the entire page I wrote:  Working with the nude model is a special adventure, but at the same time is no more sacred than working with the still life or the landscape. The difference is it is a human being. But the work is not about the artist and the model as they live their everyday lives among society, so much as it about the two participants and what they have brought to the moment of collaboration together. It is about the individual and universal feelings expressed in the visual image that comes from that collaboration. I hope I did not dance around the issue of sexuality in the statement about the work. What I attempted to say was, although many photographers describe their work with the nude as about shape, form, and light….and that it isn’t about sex….that is impossible. For we are all sexual beings along with all the other aspects of our ‘beingness.’ I described that complete self as a fabric woven of all the threads that make us up. We cannot select one thread or another, shut off one part of ourselves, as though we are made of boxes, some open, some left unopened. The model and the artist have put it all into the work. So the work contains all the feelings it should if the work is successful, and that is what makes it beautiful, and felt strongly by the viewer.

Written by Ken Smith

January 20th, 2010 at 3:00 pm

Posted in Nude, Philosophy